Pnina
Grossman
English
Composition
3/23/15
Nature, Nurture and Time
Parenting is arguably one of the most
difficult jobs that exists. Besides for caring for a child’s physical needs of
food and shelter, a parent is responsible for their child’s psychological
well-being. A good parent must then take on the precarious task of creating a
household that strikes a balance between allowing a child their individual
freedoms and ensuring their safety. This balancing act, combined with the other
authoritative roles that a parent must play, can often result in children
feeling annoyed at or embarrassed by their parents, sometimes making the parent-child
relationship a difficult one. Fortunately for adults, as children age, their
relationship with their parents matures and they come to realize the ways that
their parents unexpectedly effected them.
It is quite common for children to be ashamed of their parents or
find them unbearable. In her essay, Shooting Dad, author Sarah Vowell
describes the not uncommon experience of growing up in a house where her
politics and interests were the polar opposite of her father’s and the strife
that that caused. Vowell was interested in art while her father was an avid
gunsmith, and politically, as Vowell points out, “I blamed Dad for nuclear
proliferation and Contra aid. He believed that if I had my way, all the guns
would be confiscated and it would take the commies about minutes to parachute
in and assume control.” (Vowell, 155). Vowell found that her and her father
could not agree on many things. Psychologist and parenting expert Carl
Pickhardt points out that “[w]hat makes the vital distinction between approval
and love hard for the child to understand is that approval and disapproval have
powerful emotional connections -- both for the giver and the receiver,[1]”
meaning that children will often take this disagreement as a sign of lack of
love from their parents even if it is not intended as such.
Author Amy Tan also reflects on the gap between herself and her
immigrant mother in her essay, Mother Tongue. While Tan did not grow up
in Vowell’s self-described “house divided,” (Vowell, 152) she admits that “when
I was growing up, my mother’s ‘limited’ English limited my perception of
her. I was ashamed of her English. I believed that her English reflected the
quality of what she had to say.” (Tan, 78) Looking back on their childhoods,
both authors describe the gap that separated themselves from their respective
parents when they were younger and had , at the time, seemed unbridgeable. Luckily,
as the authors and many others have discovered, children eventually mature into
adults and their relationship with their parents matures as well.
Vowell writes her essay looking back on her childhood and seeing
how her views at the time were, unsurprisingly, childish. With this in mind,
Vowell resolves that “[t]he older I get, the more I’m interested in becoming a
better daughter” (Vowell, 155) and she makes an effort to share her father’s
interests. She also does not take it personally when her father’s political
views differ from her own, saying “[n]owadays, I giggle when Dad calls me on
Election Day to cheerfully inform me that he has once again cancelled out my
vote” (Vowell, 153). As a child, Vowell had seen her father disagreeing with
her as an affront to her beliefs, but as she has grown and matured, she
realizes that they do not have to agree on everything to respect and love each
other.
Tan did not spend her childhood looking for her mother’s approval,
but rather for society’s approval of her mother. Looking back, Tan realizes that
she was wrong about thinking that her mother’s English was embarrassing. In
fact, Tan can see that her “mother’s expressive command of English belies how
much she actually understands” (Tan, 77). In fact, Tan comes to the realization
that the people to be ashamed of are those who take people with “limited”
English less seriously than those who speak standard English. Tan even theorizes that the reason there are
so few Asian American writers is because, matching her own experience in
school, “there are other Asian American students whose English spoken in the
home might also be described as ‘broken’ or ‘limited.’ And perhaps they also have
teachers who are steering them away from writing and into math and science”
(Tan, 80). As both Tan and Vowell experience, the seemingly impossible task of
getting along with one’s parents becomes more possible with age. What’s more,
the self-examining adult will often find hidden ways in which their parents
influenced them.
Vowell’s essay could have been left
as an essay about the parent-child relationship. Instead, she takes it a step
further to become an essay of self-discovery. Early on in her essay, Vowell
hints to the similarities in temperaments between herself and her father. She
describes her house saying “[w]hile the kitchen and the living room were well
within the DMZ, the respective work spaces governed by my father and me were
jealously guarded totalitarian states in which each of us declared ourselves
dictator” (Vowell, 153). Already establishing a parallel between herself and
her father, Vowell takes it even further when she goes on to describe the
similar disorderly states of her father’s workshop and her room. While the parallel
had existed all along, Vowell does not see it until she grows up and makes an
effort to get over their differences and become close to her father. In doing
so, she goes out to help he father shoot a cannon that he made, recording the
process for her radio show. When some hikers watch them and comment on her
radio equipment, she comes to a realization: “[m]y dad and I are the same
person. We’re both smart-alecky loners with goofy projects and weird equipment”
(Vowell, 157). Vowell realizes that many of her driving characteristics – her
passion, quirks and much more – come from her father, even if they don’t share
viewpoints on everything.
Tan’s essay includes a realization that is similar to Vowell’s. In
some ways, her mother’s English made learning standard English more difficult
for Tan. Tan recounts how her own English skills were never objectively bad,
but compared to her math skills, they were lacking. She attributes this to the
more subjective nature of language. Given this discrepancy, it would have been
easy for Tan to go into a mathematics-based field, but, as Tan recounts “[f]ortunately,
I happen to be rebellious in nature and enjoy the challenge of disproving assumptions
about me” (Tan, 80). Tan not only went on to overcome this challenge, but realized
that it was one that helped her with her writing. When she later wrote her books,
she envisioned her mother as the reader and that led to her writing in a simple
and effective way that was extremely effective and successful.
The challenges of parenting are many and are made more difficult by
the fact that while children are young, having a meaningful relationship with them
can be difficult. With their limited understanding of the world, children can
mistake protection for disapproval and disapproval for lack of love. They can
also crave peer acceptance to the point that they feel ashamed of the embarrassing
things that their parents might do, whether justified or not. The important
thing to remember when raising children is that this does not come from a place
of hatred, but, rather, lack of understanding of the world. Eventually, a child
learns to accept their parents, and go on to raise children of their own who
will put them through what they put their own parents through.
[1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/surviving-your-childs-adolescence/201103/adolescence-and-parental-approval
This essay has a very good structure. Annotations and quotations were used correctly throughout the whole text.
ReplyDeleteGreat choice of topic, considering your audience. Majority of our class are just after high school and are over their teenage rebellious period. Now they start thinking about and realizing true motives that lay under their parents behavior. However, even older students can find something to relate in this essay.
Overall, very technically sound essay. Well done:)
I enjoyed the change between sources among your paragraphs, it gave a sense of direction to your ideas, which flowed coherently. The constant movement, however, made me feel like your essay compared and contrasted the sources more than presenting and supporting your argument. The topic definitely hit the class, as an audience, close to home, but it feels loose - the argument seems to be something you can't really prove with more than opinion and anecdotal examples from the sources. The essay still presented it convincingly though, and it's straight, to the point, nature helped fight against the generality of the topic. Good job.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete